I decided to choose Angela Liao’s article for this writing
prompt. First of all, I believe that the article is largely correct in assuming
that “60% of people would like to read more often but feel too busy to read” (Liao,
2017, n.p.). Personally, I am too occupied with studies for college classes, so
I usually can’t read for leisure on a regular basis. While I didn’t
particularly read for pleasure, I used to read a lot during grade school and
high school. Nevertheless, if one is motivated to read, that person will read
whenever the person acquires the chance to accomplish the task of reading.
Most books aren’t too difficult for me to read unless the
terminology is complex or the subject matter is too boring. So, the article’s
argument that some books are too difficult to get through is somewhat
implausible (Liao, 2017, n.p.). I don’t appreciate perusing through a book in
chronological order unless the book is extremely interesting; I have a tendency
to skip and read certain sections of a book. So, if a book is too difficult for
one to read through in a chronological order, a person should still be able to
read through the novel at certain places. I believe that it’s acceptable to
read books in parts or not entirely if they consist of a series of ideas. I
feel that these ideas are individual stories “that feed our spirits, our
emotions, and our intellects” (Saricks, 2009, p. 11).
I also feel that it’s a bit strange to be motivated to read
through the online book clubs of celebrities (Liao, 2017, n.p.), but I
understand that it’s still necessary to discover a purpose for reading or to be
encouraged to glance through a certain novel through a book’s online display or
description. Also, while it’s remarkably simple to follow celebrities or other
prominent individuals on Instagram through an internet search engine and an
Instagram account, the use of this social media platform through celebrities
has a negative side. It doesn’t really matter when a celebrity utilizes
Instagram; they are merely advertising for a book club, satisfying a need for
recognition through pictures of themselves with the books, or revealing a
personal interest. The article could be correct with its argument that celebrities
want to appear intelligent and relatable to other human beings (Liao, 2017,
n.p.), but these celebrities with online book clubs are still drawing attention
through social media posts for their clubs.
In addition, while a book club might be sponsored by a
trustworthy celebrity, it does not mean that the books that a celebrity
promotes contain true stories. Celebrities, such as Oprah Windrey, have
accidently promoted books that actually exhibited fake memoirs, such as James
Frey’s A Million Little Pieces (TSG
Industries Inc., 2015, n.p.). So, the novels that a celebrity promotes on a
social media platform could contain false content.
Also, posted information on any social media platform can
grow exponentially due to the number of likes or comments that a post receives.
The rate of escalation in an online context in response to a textual post can
be intoxicating and can betray the quality and meaning of the post’s
information. So, I often find the use of social media platforms for online book
clubs to be rather shallow and obsessive.
While I think that it’s interesting that Emma Watson is
utilizing her “appointment as UN Women Goodwill Ambassador” to find feminist
titles (Liao, 2017, n.p.), I don’t believe that the cause of feminism is very
inspiring. I am aware that libraries wish to teach tolerance, but I don’t feel
that the concept of feminism is actually tolerant (Saricks, 2009, p. 11). So, I
personally don’t think that the promotion of feminist titles is empowering or
being empathetic towards other people. Therefore, I don’t think that Watson’s
cause for promoting feminist titles is a good one.
Also, Watson is promoting fictional titles for her book club
for feminism. The Handmaid’s Tale may
seem inspiring, but the book is a piece of fiction (Goodreads Inc, 2018b, n.p.).
It is also difficult to discern if the supposedly real-life parallels and
aspects of The Handmaid’s Tale are
actually applicable towards real life (Goodreads Inc, 2018b, n.p.). I suspect
that much of the novel is false, since it is written by an author who wrote
dystopian or horror stories (Goodreads Inc, 2018a, n.p.).
However, I am not against using social media for beneficial
causes. I follow a handful of celebrities on twitter, such as Steve Burton. Burton
appears to have a very personal and average sort of life, despite being fairly
wealthy and being busy by traveling to work and meetings (Twitter, 2018, n.p.).
He uses his role as a celebrity to cleverly promote and advertise his
nutritional workout products (Twitter, 2018, n.p.).
I also agree with the article’s argument about celebrities
utilizing certain books to project a specific image of themselves to the public
(Liao, 2017, n.p.). I think that posting the image of a book or a description
of it creates a certain impression towards the person who posted the
information. For instance, I felt that Reese Witherspoon and Emma Robert’s
Instagram posts appeared reasonable in comparison to Emma Watson’s Instagram
posts and book selections (Liao, 2017, n.p.). I also believe that it’s quite
practical to use book clubs that are sponsored by celebrities to increase the
number of book purchases and sales, such as the increase for sales for The Potion Diaries on Amazon’s website (Liao,
2017, n.p.). In general, celebrity book clubs can create “a terrific initial
boost in sales” and popularity for a celebrity’s selected titles (Butler, Cowan,
& Nilsson, 2005, p. 23).
Also, I found that Sarah Jessica Parker’s statement about
books in the article was quite repulsive. Books should not be viewed as
companions (Liao, 2017, n.p.). Viewing and utilizing books as companions is
very anti-social. While I did read many books at a young age, I typically read
out of interest. Currently, I read a lot of articles or sections of books for
college. Sometimes, I become involved with the story of a book if it’s written
well or interesting. I try to search for value, art, ideas, and depth in books
in a critical and analytical manner. However, books are not my friends; they
are primarily reservoirs of ideas and information.
Parker’s statement also gave the impression of a passionate
and juvenile obsession with books and reading, which was distasteful to me. It’s
dismaying that the American Library Association seems to be using Parker’s
celebrity status to promote book clubs (Liao, 2017, n.p.). I don’t think that
it’s always necessary to utilize celebrities in order to promote a cause. It
would be better to appeal to a local community in a personal manner through
certain relevant organizations or causes. I appreciate book clubs when they
meaningfully connect with the local community or bring people together.
However, some book clubs that are sponsored by celebrities without a good cause
give a repulsive impression to me.
References:
Butler, R. J., Cowan, B. W., & Nilsson,
S. (2005). From Obscurity to Bestseller: Examining the
Impact of Oprah's Book Club Selections. Publishing
Research Quarterly, 20(4), 23-34.
Retrieved from
133991-03da-49d2-aece-a9d2aa626230@sessionmgr4007
Goodreads Inc. (2018a). Margaret Atwood. Retrieved from
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3472.Margaret_Atwood
Goodreads Inc. (2018b). The Handmaid's Tale. Retrieved from
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38447.The_Handmaid_s_Tale
Liao, Angela. (2017, Jun. 30). Celebrity Book Clubs Create Virtual Reading
Community.
Retrieved from https://www.bookstr.com/celebrity-book-clubs-create-virtual-reading-community
Saricks, J. G. (2009). The readers’
advisory guide to genre fiction (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL:
American Library Association.
TSG Industries Inc.. (2015). A Million Little Lies. Retrieved from
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/celebrity/million-little-lies
Twitter. (2018). Steve Burton. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/1SteveBurton?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor