Content Pages

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Week Sixteen Prompt


            The experience of reading has become more complicated since I was a child in the late 1990s to early 2000s in the United States. I feel that books strongly reflect current trends in American culture, such as the trend of equally representing all individuals in pieces of information and the trend of placing a stronger emphasis on the group of persons of GBLTQ in novels. The aspect of social justice is also more prominent towards the creation of books in the present time, since the concept of social justice has been heavily emphasized by the culture of the internet. Since my childhood, more formats for books have been developed, such as digital ebooks and audiobook CDs, as opposed to physical books and the audio cassette tapes of books in my past. In addition, the general shift towards the digitization of printed information in books and widespread accessibility and acceptance of electronic text is a massive change from reading during my childhood. Also, books are presently available in a multimedia formats. During my childhood, books could only be constructed around one specific format.
            Also, I don’t know what trends in reading will occur in twenty years, so I can only give guesses based on my observations and on certain readings from the class. I think that publishing will become more intense in twenty years of time. Many authors currently try to sell their individually published novels through online publishers, such as Amazon.com, so I would argue that authors will continue to publish their novels through companies that utilize the internet or through online retailers. In some ways, reading will become more interactive with the stronger incorporation of multimedia formats and the integration of the idea of having multiple endings in the process of reading books. This idea may stem from the idea of authors not assuming responsibility towards certain events or the ending of a certain novel. However, the idea of an interactive book may merely arise from letting readers decide their own ending or allowing the readers to be excited by sudden twists in the book’s narrative by permitting the readers to directly choose the outcome of the book’s events.
            I also believe that traditional publishing will greatly diminish, since a greater emphasis will be placed on online publishing or independent publishing. Traditional publishers of books will slowly go out of business, as authors publish titles under massive corporations, such as Barnes & Noble. However, traditional publishers will still appeal to old-fashioned readers or to readers from a group of individuals from approximately forty to ninety years of age, since these individuals will be used to the idea of reading physical novels from traditional publishers. So, there should be a small following of individuals who will sustain the profits of traditional publishers in the future.  
            In addition, I believe that the activity of reading books will be extremely popular among a teenage demographic or a demographic group of individuals in their twenties and thirties, since I have observed that these demographic groups read at great rate in the present day. Individuals will read more a considerable amount more than they currently do, since I believe that the amount of current reading from ordinary individuals has exploded with online publishing. Also, if escapism is heavily emphasized as a reason for today’s reading culture, then it is probable that individuals will desire to read at an extremely high degree in the future in order to escape the hardships of a technologically progressing world.
            Personally, the strong possibility of this occurring in twenty years disgusts me. I feel that a dramatic increase in reading will be a double-edged sword in the future. The increase in the amount of published works may promote an increase in knowledge when facts and parallels to real life are incorporated in books, but the effect from individuals reading a great amount of fiction titles will be devastating. Individuals will become obsessed over details that are meaningless. Tropes will be worn thin in fictional novels. Characters will also feel flat and uninspired, since the attributes of the characters have been created by other authors in the past, and the characters will lack a quality that is truly appealing in horde of online and physical books that have been published. Nevertheless, the classic tropes in the titles of fiction will beckon to masses of fans, and the fans will continue to read.
            In addition, the act of reading books will be often accomplished in order fulfill “a social need” (Le Guin, 2008, p. 3). Specifically, individuals will desire “to experience and share great stories” to fulfill their social needs (Hollands, 2016, p. 27). So, individuals will read in order to better appeal socially to their friends and to remain self-absorbed. These individuals will desire books that “everybody is reading” (Le Guin, 2008, p. 3), and the individuals will utilize the content of the books for a mere opportunity to connect themselves with other human beings (Le Guin, 2008, p. 3).
            I also believe that many individuals currently read for themselves, and they will continue to read for themselves in twenty years. Individuals don’t usually read for knowledge or wisdom, but they will read for an emotional release. Some individuals will read for critical analysis, but few individuals will think for themselves. Due to the ubiquitous presence of the internet in the future, individuals will primarily rely on the opinions and reviews of others in relation to reading books and ignore arriving at their unique conclusions of certain books. Individuals will often follow unanimous opinions of the crowd and avoid writing controversial statements on social media websites, such as Goodreads or Facebook, when discussing their opinions on certain books.
            It should also be noted that publishers currently “get away with making boring, baloney-mill novels into bestsellers via mere P.R. because people need bestsellers” (Le Guin, 2008, p. 3). So, in twenty years, I would expect popular series, such as The Hunger Games, to drastically fade from human memory from the books’ sheer dissonance with reality and from the author’s reliance on serving the needs of the public through the aspects of the books in order to sell a suitable amount of printed or electronic copies. If this trend does not occur in the future, then a hollow sense of nostalgia towards the books will likely triumph.
            In addition, the world of reading will continue to remain as a pointless and fanatical juggernaut in twenty years. Within the last twenty years, the internet has probably exacerbated the problem of reading fiction at a drastic rate, but the popularity of reading fictional titles of different genres has always remained fanatical. The fanaticism about Frank Herbert’s Dune in the past is hardly different from the zeal of fans towards the newest Game of Thrones novel in the present day, so I expect that spirit of fanaticism towards books to remain in the next twenty years. Individuals will pointlessly compare aspects of fiction with elements of reality through relating reality back towards fantasy and making fantasy adhere to reality. Both women and men will be pointlessly drawn to the allure of fiction and will be mysteriously excited by its promise of relief and of satisfaction in relation to a real world that unfortunately appears boring or meaningless to those readers.
            Nevertheless, the unique voices of literature and the sole impact of an individual or a group effort in a work never appears to die. If the voices and impact do die, then the deaths will be slow. The content of literary materials will transcend time, since individuals will need “to be able to have books to suit” their every mood (Saricks, 2009, p. 11).
            Since timeless stories and snapshots of authors’ voices have been created in the past for certain novels, the future will also reflect this unique occurrence. Individuals will not primarily focus on the aspect of fondly remembering works of great fiction, but they will focus on the achievement of the voices who created the works. The books will be viewed as a recording of the past and of the knowledge, memories, and beliefs of the individuals who created the books.
            Titles of true literature will not only serve the needs of the public in the future, and there will be sparks of inspiration and life-like qualities within the titles. Titles will be constructed that reflect a triumph of human freedom. The construction of titles will celebrate life in a general sense and will make one more deeply consider the various elements of life in the future. These titles will be stories “that feed our spirits, our emotions, and our intellects” (Saricks, 2009, p. 11).
References:
Hollands, N. (2016). Every book its reader: after the renaissance. Booklist, (7). 27. Retrieved
from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=9c3128f8-8641-43cf-80c9-80ba08196ebd@pdc-v-sessmgr01
Le Guin, U. K. (2008). Staying awake: notes on the alleged decline of reading. Harper's
Magazine, 316(1893). Retrieved from
https://iu.instructure.com/courses/1702577/files/folder/Week%2016?preview=75530224
Saricks, J. G. (2009). The readers’ advisory guide to genre fiction (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL:
            American Library Association.

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Week 15 Prompt

            I believe that one of the most beneficial ways to market the fiction collection of the Georgetown library branch of the Allen County Public Library system is to create displays for the fiction collection. The act of using displays can function as passive advisory for the Georgetown library branch’s service for the public (Hilyard, 2010, p. 12). The books of the fiction collection should be revealed in designed displays in certain areas of the library. These areas should be strategically placed in order to attract the most attention and to be the most accessible to library patrons. The displays of books should also be located in areas that are relevant to the genre and audience of the books. For example, adult fantasy books should be placed in a makeshift display near the two library shelves in the adult section where adult fantasy books are placed in the library’s collection. Also, novels that influenced later titles in respect to one genre or multiple genres could be paired together. For example, The Vampyre by John William Polidori could be paired with Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight in a display; this pairing could be displayed to promote the books and to further educate the public on the origins of the literary idea of vampires in the horror, romance, and fantasy genres.
            Physical displays could also connect the library’s fictional and physical books in its collection with film adaptations of popular novels of fiction. The Georgetown library branch could especially focus on promoting film adaptations of young adult novels, since they are popular with children and teenagers. For example, the library could reveal DVDs of film adaptations of the Harry Potter novels or the Percy Jackson books in specific displays. Also, using a display with both paperback and electronic materials will show that the library provides more than one type of medium for its resources in its entire collection of fiction. The provision of a DVD and a book could additionally be used in a display for the comparison of the film adaptation of the book and the actual book that the film utilized. For example, the young adult novel, The Maze Runner, could be placed alongside a DVD of the novel’s film adaptation, The Maze Runner, in a display.
            The Georgetown library branch of the Allen County Public Library could also utilize online readers’ advisory to market the library’s collection of fictional works. Utilizing online readers’ advisory would be highly beneficial, since it “offers many advantages to library patrons” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). For instance, online readers’ advisory distinctly appeals “to patrons because of the privacy and convenience it affords” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). In addition, online readers’ advisory would be beneficial for library employees to utilize, since online readers’ advisory can “offer librarians an opportunity to provide better service” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). Also, online readers’ advisory can assist librarians that operate as advisors by allowing them “to consult with their colleagues and peruse appropriate tools without stress” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). So, utilizing online readers’ advisory for marketing the library’s fiction collection appears to be a suitable choice for the Georgetown library branch.
            Specifically, the Georgetown library branch could display the fiction collection of the Georgetown library branch on the Allen County Public Library’s website. The library branch’s fiction collection on the website could utilize online readers’ advisory in order to “promote the contents of a library’s collections, bringing attention to books that might otherwise go overlooked” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). The use of the Allen County Public Library’s website with the Georgetown library branch’s online display of its fiction collection would be beneficial, since it would alert library users “to the services, events, and resources that will be available to them when they visit” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 132). The presence of the website would also attract the attention of library patrons, since the patrons could learn of online readers’ advisory “if they visit a library website that highlights it” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). In addition, displaying the Georgetown library branch’s fiction collection on the Allen County Public Library’s website would function as part of online readers’ advisory, since it would assist library users in easily finding materials that are part of the library’s collection.
            Also, the Georgetown library branch could use online readers’ advisory by promoting specific fictional novels on certain social media websites. Social media websites are significant for the Georgetown library branch to use, since they incorporate the communication of “ideas, products, and services across the spectrum of industries and services” (Herther, 2013, p. 38). For instance, the Georgetown library branch could use the Goodreads website in order to form recommendations for a list of fictional books that are physically and electronically present at the library’s physical location. Using the Goodreads website would be beneficial, since the Goodreads website can be used to “connect users to one another based on common interests and create communities of readers online” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 134). In addition, the Goodreads website provides “avid readers with a forum for learning about hooks, connecting with authors, sharing reading tastes, and keeping track of their own reading and book ownership in a social setting” (Herther, 2013, p. 39). Furthermore, the Goodreads website utilizes recommendations, reader reviews, and discussion groups in order to “fuel the interest and ongoing commitment of members of this free service” (Herther, 2013, p. 39). Also, the Goodreads website is at least considered valuable to a certain degree with its “user data, reviews, successful software, and community” (Herther, 2013, p. 39). So, the library’s use of the Goodreads website is highly beneficial towards connecting ordinary library patrons with the resources of its collection of fictional titles.
            Also, the Georgetown library branch could utilize online tools as part of its online readers’ advisory. The Georgetown library branch could utilize Web 2.0 tools, such as “blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, and podcasts to promote books and communicate with patrons” (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133). Additionally, the Georgetown library branch could use the online tool of “LibraryThing to keep track of what other librarians are reading” and to create online lists of reading materials for library patrons (Hilyard, 2010, p. 11). These online readers’ advisory tools could be promoted and listed in the physical library system by having at least one computer with an evident web layout of an online readers’ advisory tool, such as NoveList for library patrons.
            In addition, the Georgetown library branch could employ the use of signs in order to promote its fiction collection. The use of signs at the library’s physical location could encourage the reading of books in the library’s collection of fictional titles (Saricks, 2005, p. 137). Also, the Georgetown library branch’s supply of “good, clear signage and an inviting and efficient physical arrangement are the first steps in creating an atmosphere conducive to readers’ advisory activities” (Saricks, 2005, p. 138). In addition, the act of library patrons looking at signs with a long list of reading options would likely result “in increased visibility and a more accessible readers’ advisory service” for the library (Saricks, 2005, p. 138). Librarians could also utilize social media websites, such as Pinterest, to gather ideas about how to design signs at the library’s physical location in order to attract the most attention from library patrons. In addition, the Georgetown library branch could utilize Pinterest to create online signs for certain books in its fiction collection (Burke & Strothmann, 2015, p. 133).
References:
Burke, S. K., & Strothmann, M. (2015). Adult Readers' Advisory Services through Public
Library Websites. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(2), 132-143. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=cdb71d90-35c8-44f0-822e-e04ad92ef75e@sessionmgr4008
Herther, N. K. (2013). Good reads. Online Searcher37(4), 38. Retrieved from
Hilyard, N. B. (2010). The Expanding Scope of Readers' Advisory. Public Libraries49(1), 10-
25. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=78198b61-1447-4e49-bdb2-310ddc2da8a8@sessionmgr4010
Saricks, J. (2005). Promoting and marketing readers’ advisory collections and services [PDF
file]. In Readers’ Advisory Service in the Public Library. Chicago: ALA. 136-160.
Retrieved from
https://iu.instructure.com/courses/1702577/files/folder/Week%2015?preview=75530157

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Week Fourteen Prompt

            Personally, I would like to acquire a position at the Allen County Public Library system at the location of the Georgetown library branch. Specifically, I could work at a position that involved shelving materials. In relation to African American materials, I believe that it is not necessary to separate African American materials from the collection unless there exists sensitive feelings from the public towards certain racial groups. However, I can understand that the portion of street lit books from African American materials would be controversial in a library’s collection; I believe that the risky or violent nature of the books should be addressed in the library’s main collection. The library system could label all of its books from different genres with books from the specific genre of street lit with a rating towards the amount of violence and sexual content in the novels (Honig, 2011, pp. xvi-xvii). Other African American materials without high levels of sex or violence should be accepted into the main portion of the collection without any issues.
            Another reason why I desire to include African American materials into the collection is due to the uniqueness of the street lit genre. The street lit genre has not gained much recognition due to its controversial nature (Munshi, 2015, n.p.), so it is likely that the genre is not widely known in average bookstores or libraries. Incorporating titles from street lit would allow many local residents to be surprised and refreshed by the novelty of the content of the titles.
            In addition, a third reason for including African American materials into a library’s collection is to better represent the demographic of young black individuals. The inclusion of African American materials would provide for the reading needs of these young black individuals and would represent the individuals in familiar living areas in the novels (Munshi, 2015, n.p.). Also, street lit has recently become popular (Honig, 2011, p. ix), so including titles from the street lit genre would reflect and satisfy the needs of the public.
            In relation to GBLTQ fiction, I strongly feel that GBLTQ fiction should be separated from the main collection. One reason why I wish to separate GBLTQ fiction from the main collection is centered on the idea of public libraries remaining unbiased. I believe that pushing for the inclusion of GBLTQ literature is encouraging social justice. Public libraries should reflect the will of the public; they should not advocate for causes of social justice. While some areas explored in public libraries can cross lines of morality in relation to the public, public libraries should remain as unbiased as possible.
            Another reason for separating GBLTQ books from the collection is the great probability of no adverse effects. For example, separation of GBLTQ materials will not matter, since there is still access to the materials. The accessibility of GBLTQ materials are a much greater issue than the separation of the materials from the collection. The promotion of the idea of segregation is also not problematic, since GBLTQ materials are not human beings. Also, the rights of the materials are not restricted by being separated from the rest of the books. So, due to the sensitive content of the subject of GBLTQ novels, the novels should be separated from the collection in order to appease public feelings about the novels.
            A third reason for keeping GBLTQ novels in a separate location is the expectation that individuals can still find beneficial authors that are different from the reader. I don’t think that separating materials with subjects about GBLTQ from the main collection of a public library would prevent the beneficial discovery of an author who might be different from the reader. There is still a considerable amount of access to materials if the GBLTQ novels are separated from the collection. I don’t see any tremendous benefit towards discovering an author who might be different from the reader in a library’s large collection in relation to finding an author who might be different from the reader in a separated and small collection. A reader will still make a beneficial discovery of an author, since the reader has a fair degree of access to materials to make the decision.
             In addition, it is evident that GBLTQ materials span across a number of genres, since “a broad range of fiction has emerged that effectively captures” the concerns of gays and lesbians (Thomas, 2007, p. 40). Also, the GBLTQ materials exhibit historical importance with classic titles, so the library system should not deliberately censor the materials or remove them entirely from the library’s collection (Thomas, 2007, p. 40). So, it is acceptable to place the GBLTQ items in an isolated area of the library. 
            Personally, I find the subject of GBLTQ to be repulsive, especially since homosexuality goes against my beliefs and the idea of regular reproductive biology. Also, I think that many American communities are uncomfortable and do not agree with the ideas presented in GBLTQ materials. So, in a perfect world, books with GBLTQ content would be removed from the shelves of libraries. However, life is controversial in many ways, and books help us to understand the differences between right and incorrect types of thinking. Therefore, I will still respect the right of library patrons to read the content of GBLTQ materials. So, GBLTQ books should be included in the library’s collection, but the books should be separated from the main portion of the collection due to the books’ controversial nature in most local communities.
            Also, conservative or heterosexual couples will likely not enjoy seeing homosexual books in the children’s section of a library’s primary collection. The culture of the internet is changing opinions about homosexuality, but the majority of Americans will still be distressed to openly see such materials in a library system. These materials can last a long time, so their importance is felt in a community. Therefore, libraries should consider placing GBLTQ materials in a labeled and separate section of the library.
             The only problem that arises from separating GBLTQ materials from the collection is the issue of placing labels on materials. Labels will have connotations. It is also believed that labeling certain items will restrict access to the items, since “libraries tend to avoid special labels because they believe people should have access to as much material as possible” (Lenzini, 2018, n.p.). However, I believe that labeling materials does not substantially restrict access to the materials if the materials are still within the library space. The materials’ separation from the collection does not mean that the materials are inaccessible to the public. Therefore, I don’t think that these labels matter in relation to their use in public libraries.
References:
Honig, Megan. (2011). Introduction. In Urban Grit: A guide to street lit. Santa Barbara: Libraries
Unlimited. Retrieved from https://iu.instructure.com/courses/1702577/files/folder/Week%2014?preview=75530098
Lenzini, J. (2018, Mar. 20). Orange City, IA public library to test trial-run of separately labeling
Munshi, Neil. (2015, Nov. 13). Urban fiction: words on the street. Financial Times. Retrieved
            from https://www.ft.com/content/08785ece-86ee-11e5-9f8c-a8d619fa707c
Thomas, D. (2007). A place on the shelf. Library Journal, (8). 40. Retrieved from
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=c4399ec5-8fb0-4540-84fd-48b90beafed2@sessionmgr4007

Saturday, April 7, 2018

Week Thirteen Prompt

            Librarians should always work hard to serve adults that enjoy young adult literature or graphic novels. I believe that it’s acceptable to promote books to any age group. I think that it’s strange that individuals consider young adult novels or graphic novels to be unacceptable, since I believe that young adult novels or graphic novels are subgenres. Subgenres may not be promoted as much as primary genres in libraries and bookstores, but they are significant parts of genres. Also, all books from all genres are legitimate literary choices. Unless there are immoral ideas present in a book, pieces of conveyed information in a book are worth promoting in relation to the pursuit of gaining knowledge. So, I strongly feel that it is ridiculous that individuals believe that capital shouldn’t be utilized towards the purchase of the materials of young adult books or graphic novels and the promotion of the materials for adults.
            In addition, I believe that there is a certain stigma attached to reading materials below one’s age, since reading below one’s age can seem immature. So, a common belief exists that adults shouldn’t read young adult literature or graphic novels. Also, I feel that there is a perception that materials for children exhibit less information or quality and that materials for adults exhibit more information and a high quality. This perception is completely subjective and irrelevant in relation to books of literature, since these books are merely containers of information.
            Another reason that the common belief exists may be due to the culture of the internet and the demographic of millennials, since I believe that there is much misunderstanding and negativity towards the culture of the internet and millennials in relation to appreciating young adult materials and graphic novels. I feel that individuals may view appreciating young adult materials and graphic novels as a juvenile behavior or mentality. Also, I would argue that popular culture is closely tied to young adult literature and graphic novels, which naturally makes young adult literature and graphic novels popular for millennials. At the same time, some adults may view popular culture and any associations with popular culture as pointless and irrelevant in relation to real life, so these adults may view materials that are associated with popular culture in a negative manner.
            However, declaring that adults shouldn’t read unsuitable books for an inferior audience for adolescents or individuals of the demographic of millennials is ridiculous, since the young adult books or graphic novels are merely repositories of information. Reading the books or novels has nothing to do with one’s maturity level, since these materials contain only plots and information for one to experience and comprehend. Meaning in these books is conveyed by one’s own experiences and beliefs and by relating these experiences and beliefs to the characters and events of a fictional plot.
            While it is understandable that young adult literature or new adult literature may be shunned from its liberal ideas, such as the idea of “getting out from under the proverbial thumb of controlling families” (NA Alley – Books, Art, Education, and Learning about a Healthy Home, 2018, n.p.), young adult literature is still information that is being conveyed to individuals. Whether a product of young adult books or graphic novels is originally hated or loved will become irrelevant as time passes on. New rhetorical narratives will be created by the public for the product. Sometimes, the narratives will focus on negative aspects of the plots, but the narratives will often be positive, as nostalgia and the need to recognize the product as being culturally relevant takes over the public’s original experience or perception of the plots. So, the public disapproval towards adults reading young adult materials or graphic novels will likely deteriorate over time.
            As librarians, we should strive to make every effort towards serving adults by addressing their needs for young adult novels or graphic novels. Librarians have a duty to shape reader’s advisory in the current time, since they helped to respond “to social concerns articulated by forces outside the profession” in the past (Burek Pierce, J., 2006, p. 42). There is still a “popular concern today about teens’ time with computers, television, and music rather than with books” (Burek Pierce, J., 2006, p. 42), so librarians need to be ready to defend the freedom to read young adult literature and graphic novels in the face of criticism and censorship.   
            Librarians can promote young adult literature and graphic novels in a positive manner or emphasize the timeless quality of the story of the materials by setting up posters in public libraries. In addition, librarians can schedule events or meetings that include community involvement to promote young adult novels or graphic novels. For instance, a public library could schedule a festival that involves local adults selling or showing their young adult or graphic novels at certain booths; this festival would raise awareness of young adult or graphic novels and display the books’ significance towards the public. Furthermore, by showing that the young adult books and graphic novels are significant, the public library will encourage ordinary individuals to view young adult books and graphic novels in a more positive manner and be more accepting of other age groups to read the content of the young adult books and graphic novels.
            Also, since a number of young adult novels appear to be marketed for an adult audience under the label of the new adult subgenre, librarians could promote materials of young adult novels with the title of new adult books. The new adult genre, which is “aimed at an adult audience”, would exhibit a strong appeal for adults (Brookover, Burns, & Jensen, 2014, p. 42). Also, it has been claimed that works of the new adult genre “have mass appeal among teens and adults” (Cataldi, 2015, p. 42), so it is suitable to promote a number of maturely written young adult books as part of the new adult genre for adults. In addition, authors of new adult books “have amassed huge followings and on average write several books a year each” (Cataldi, 2015, p. 42), so librarians can easily advertise the popularity of the authors and their new adult books in a beneficial manner for the public. Additionally, adults would likely present themselves as “an audience of dedicated, loyal, even ravenous readers” for the new adult books (Brookover, Burns, & Jensen, 2014, p. 42).

References:
Brookover, S., Burns, E., & Jensen, K. (2014). What's New About New Adult?. Horn Book
Magazine90(1), 41. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=4b56ecee-bacd-4729-89b5-dd70316dcdaf@sessionmgr4009
Burek Pierce, J. (2006). The Borderland Age and Borderline Books: The Early Practice of
Reader's Advisory for Youth. Young Adult Library Services5(1), 42-47. Retrieved from
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=ce1c3c19-8ca4-4ca0-8a59-787b0296ad6c@sessionmgr103
Cataldi, E. (2015). Betwixt and between. Library Journal, (14). 42. Retrieved from
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=aab00f0c-ceaf-4f6e-ada7-cacc7b09f18a@sessionmgr103
NA Alley – Books, Art, Education, and Learning about a Healthy Home. (2018). FAMILY-TIES
IN NEW-ADULT FICTION. Retrieved from http://www.naalley.com/2013/07/match-5-lucas-1-vs-trent-17.html